STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT TRAVIS J. COLLIER NO. 2024 CW 0409 VERSUS GREGORY TRAHAN, COSTAL HEAVY HAULER, LLC, GRAY INSURANCE COMPANY AND THE TRAVELERS JUNE 3, 2024 INDEMNITY COMPANY

In Re: Gregory Trahan, Coastal Heavy Hauler, LLC and The Gray Insurance Company, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 709,081.

BEFORE: WOLFE, MILLER, AND GREENE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED.

SMM Wolfe, J., concurs. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc. , 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981) (per curiam) are not met.

Greene, J., dissents and would grant the writ in part. I would reverse the portion of the May 6, 2 02 4 judgment of the district court ordering defendants, Gregory Trahan, Coastal Heavy Haulers, LLC and The Gray Insurance Company, to disclose the questions to be asked during the examination at least 7 days in advance of the scheduled examination. Once the court finds the party seeking an additional medical examination has established good cause for same, the court should presume that the examination will be conducted in a reasonable manner. If the opposing party seeks to have restrictions placed on said examination, the burden shifts to that party to establish special circumstances justifying the imposition of said restrictions. In meeting this burden, one may not rely on mere allegations or speculation, but should produce competent evidence establishing a need for the restrictions and the harm which could result without same. In reviewing the pleadings, including the motion to compel additional medical opinion and the opposition filed thereto, I would find that plaintiff failed to produce competent evidence establishing a need for any restrictions required for the examination and what harm might result if such restrictions were not imposed. See Augustine v. Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon, 2021-01753 (La. 10/21/22), 351 So.3d 353 (per curiam). The requirement of producing questions 7 days prior to the examination frustrates the importance of the additional medical examination in furthering the pursuit of justice recognized by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Hicks v. USAA General Indemnity Company, 2021-00840 (La. 3/25/22), 339 So.3d 1106. In all other respects I would deny the writ.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

0p~wERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT