Ayanna Wilson and Kalanjoe Wilson v. Susan R. Watson and Capital Area Transit System
Ayanna Wilson and Kalanjoe Wilson v. Susan R. Watson and Capital Area Transit System
Opinion
I
I
AYANNA WILSON AND KALANJOE NO. 2024 CW 1316 WILSON
VERSUS
SUSAN R. WATSON, AND CAPITAL MARCH 14, 2025 AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM
In Re: Capital Area Transit System and Susan R. Watson, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 741258.
BEFORE: THERIOT, HESTER, AND EDWARDS, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s November 22, 2024 judgment denying the motion for involuntary dismissal filed by Capital Area Transit System and Susan R. Watson is reversed. Plaintiffs, Ayanna Wilson and Kalanjoe Wilson, failed to request service of their petition within 90 days of its filing, as required by La. Code Civ. P. art. 1201( C) and La. R. S. 13: 5107( D). The trial court legally erred by finding plaintiffs demonstrated good cause for their failure to timely request service. See Igbinoghene v. St. Paul Travelers Ins. Co., 2011- 0124 ( La. 4/ 4/ 11), 58 So. 3d 452 ( per curiam) ; Miller v. Hirstius, 2022- 0740 ( La. App. 1st Cir.' 3/ 15/ 23), 363 So. 3d 532. Accordingly, the motion for involuntary dismissal filed by Capital Area Transit System and Susan R. Watson is granted, and the claims of Ayanna Wilson and Kalanjoe Wilson against Capital Area Transit System and Susan R. Watson are dismissed without prejudice. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 1672( C).
MRT CHH BDE
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
TY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.