Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2025

Thomas E. Campbell v. City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge

Thomas E. Campbell v. City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided October 24, 2025

Thomas E. Campbell v. City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge

Opinion

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT THOMAS E. CAMPBELL NO. 2025 CW 0714 PAGE I OF 2 VERSUS

CITY OF BATON ROUGE, PARISH OCTOBER 24, 2025 OF EAST BATON ROUGE

In Re: City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 695811.

BEFORE: MCCLENDON, C. J., THERIOT, PENZATO, EDWARDS AND BALFOUR, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court' s February 5, 2025 judgment denying the motion for summary filed by defendant, judgment the City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge (" City/ Parish"), is reversed. Under La. R. S. 9: 2800, in order to prove a public entity is liable for damages caused by a thing, plaintiff must establish: custody or ownership of the defective thing by the public entity; the defect created an unreasonable risk of harm; the public entity had actual or constructive notice of the defect; the public entity failed to take corrective action within a reasonable time; and causation. See Robinson v. Pointe Coupee Par. Sch. Bd., 2023- 0215 La. App. 1st Cir. 2/ 21/ 24) 2024 WL 702600 at * 4( unpublished).

Failure to meet any one of these statutory requirements will defeat a claim against a public entity. Id. Plaintiff, Thomas E. Campbell, argued constructive the notice asserting City/ Parish would have noticed the condition at issue if it had conducted reasonable inspections of the bike path. Constructive notice exists when the defect or condition has existed for such a period of time that it would have been discovered and had the remedied public body exercised reasonable care. Racca v. St. Mary Sugar Cooperative, Inc., 2002- 1766 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 2/ 23/ 04), 872 So. 2d 1117, 1126, writ denied, 2004- 0698 ( La. 5/ 7/ 04), 872 So. 2d 1083. However, the City/ Parish' s duty to use reasonable care in maintaining its public ways does not encompass conducting periodic inspections . . . and

the failure to conduct such inspections does not imply knowledge of a dangerous defect. See Jones v. Hawkins, 98- 1259 ( La. 3/ 19/ 99), 731 So. 2d 216, 220. Furthermore, the failure to conduct inspections does not impute to the City/ Parish constructive knowledge of defects in its public ways. See Id. We find plaintiff failed to carry his burden of producing factual support sufficient to establish the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to the element of actual or constructive notice.

Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is granted, and plaintiff' s claims against defendant, the City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge, are dismissed with prejudice.

PMC MRT AHP

NO. 2025 CW 0714 PAGE 2 OF 2

Edwards and Balfour, JJ., dissent and would deny the writ.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.