State of Louisiana v. John D. LaFleur
Opinion
Judgment rendered January 14, 2026.
No. 56,579-KA ON REHEARING COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA Appellee versus JOHN D. LaFLEUR Appellant ***** Per Curiam on Rehearing Originally appealed from the First Judicial District Court for the Parish of Caddo, Louisiana Trial Court No. 397,839 Honorable Donald E. Hathaway, Jr., Judge ***** LOUISIANA APPEALS & WRIT SERVICE Counsel for By: Holli Herrle-Castillo Appellant JAMES E. STEWART, SR. Counsel for District Attorney Appellee ASHLIN N. THOMAS ERIC M. WHITEHEAD Assistant District Attorneys ***** Before STONE, STEPHENS, ROBINSON, MARCOTTE, and ELLENDER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Despite the silence of one penalty provision, R.S. 14:35.3 (L), with respect to the denial of benefits, another subsection, 14:35.3 (C), required the district court to impose “at least forty-eight hours of the sentence” without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. State v. Caldwell, 56,269 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/21/25), 411 So. 3d 934; State v. Williams, 56,351 (La. App. 2 Cir. 7/16/25), 416 So. 3d 943. On rehearing, we find the district court’s imposition of one year without benefits satisfied both portions of the statute. The original sentence is affirmed in its entirety.
REHEARING GRANTED; ORIGINAL SENTENCE AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.