Natt v. Wolf

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Natt v. Wolf

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

RAJWINDER SINGH NATT #A201-917-735 CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00427 SEC P VERSUS JUDGE DRELL CHAD WOLF ET AL MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

. JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein (ECF No. 10) and after a de novo review of the record including the Objection filed by Petitioner (ECF No. 12), and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (ECF No. 2) is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. In so ruling, we note that the Ninth Circuit opinion upon which Petitioner relies has been reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court. See Department _of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, US ,

140 S.Ct. 1959

(June 25, 2020). There is no Suspension Clause violation.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana, this / g day of July, 2020.

DEE D. DRELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Reference

Status
Unknown