Lott v. Lopinto

United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana

Lott v. Lopinto

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

MICHAEL HARRISON LOTT CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO: 19-14010-WBV

JOSEPH LOPINTO, ET AL. SECTION: “D”(5)

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Complaint (R. Doc. 5), the record, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (R. Doc. 32), and the failure of plaintiff, Michael Harrison Lott, to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and further, having given Plaintiff additional time to file objections considering Plaintiff’s pro se status, hereby approves the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion herein. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

claims against defendants, Deputy Joshua Porche, Deputy M. Perez, and Captain Alex Norman, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE until such time as the conditions of Heck v. Humphrey,

512 U.S. 477

(1994) are met. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

claim against defendant, James Willie of Walmart, is DISMISSED as frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)@) and (ii), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1). New Orleans, Louisiana, February 22, 2021.

WENDY 5 VITTER United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown