Kikvadze v. Wolf

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Kikvadze v. Wolf

Trial Court Opinion

a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

KAKHA KIKVADZE #A213-429-687, CIVIL DOCKET NO. 1:21-CV-00154 Plaintiff SEC P

VERSUS JUDGE JOSEPH

CHAD WOLF, MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES Defendants

MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is a “Motion to Certify Matter as Urgent and Consequently an Expedited Decision” (ECF No. 2) filed by Petitioner Kakha Kikvadze (“Kikvadze”). Kikvadze is a detainee in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) detained at the LaSalle Detention Center in Jena, Louisiana. He seeks his release from custody due to prolonged detention and the COVID-19 pandemic. Because Kikvadze cannot show that he is uniquely entitled expedited consideration of his Petition, his Motion (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. I. Background Kikvadze is a native and citizen of Georgia who was ordered removed on June 3, 2020. ECF No. 1-2 at 22. Kikvadze alleges that his detention is unconstitutional as it amounts to cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment and violates ,

533 U.S. 678

(2001). ECF No. 1, 2. Documents attached to Kikvadze’s Petition indicate that he suffers from chronic back pain. ECF No. 1-2. He also alleges to suffer from arthritis and kidney and liver dysfunction arising from excessive use of tramadol. ECF No. 3 at 12. These

illnesses are not documented in the medical records Kikvadze provides. Nor are they comorbidities recognized by the Center for Disease Control as placing Kikvadze at increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19.1 On April 28, 2020, Kikvadze tested positive for COVID-19. ECF No. 1-2 at 2. He subsequently recovered from the virus, but alleges to have breathing problems arising from testing positive for COVID-19. ECF No. 3 at 13. In November 2020,

Kikvadze sought medical treatment due to chest pain, dizziness, and a “racing heart.” ECF No. 1-2 at 13. Kikvadze was examined and found to have normal heart rhythm and clear lungs. at 14. II. Law and Analysis Kikvadze has been ordered to amend his Petition to provide additional allegations in support of his claim. ECF No. 10. The Government should be allowed a meaningful opportunity to respond, if necessary, after Kikvadze amends.

“[A]llowing Respondent[s] time to answer [the] Petition – and conduct[] a full review of all available and pertinent evidence – is warranted, commonplace [in this Court and others], and reasonable under Rule 4.” , No. 1:16-cv-148, 2016 WL2893709, at *2 & n.4 (W.D. La. Apr. 13, 2016), ,

2016 WL 2844013

(W.D. La. May 12, 2016).

1 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical- conditions.html III. Conclusion Because Kikvadze is not entitled to expedited consideration of his Petition, IT IS ORDERED that his Motion (ECF No. 2) is DENIED. SIGNED on Wednesday, March 17, 2021. Hy i? / JOSEPH H.L: PEREZ-MONTES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown