King v. Hutson
King v. Hutson
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
KENSHAWN GAVIN KING CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS NO. 23-6857
SUSAN HUTSON, ET AL. SECTION “R” (3)
ORDER AND REASONS
Plaintiff, Kenshawn Gavin King, filed this action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983on December 7, 2023, while a pretrial detainee incarcerated at the Orleans Justice Center.1 King claims that excessive force was used against him on June 12, 2023.2 On March 15, 2024, mail sent to plaintiff at the Orleans Justice Center, his address of record, was returned to the Court as undeliverable.3 Subsequent mail to him at the same address was likewise returned as undeliverable and stamped “NO LONGER IN CUSTODY.”4 On May 30, 2024, Magistrate Judge Eva J. Dossier issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute.5 King did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Douglass
1 R. Doc. 4. 2
Id. at 4-5. 3 R. Doc. 14. 4 R. Doc. 17. 5 R. Doc. 19. v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1430(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds,
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the reeommendation.”). The Court finds
no clear error. Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Dossier’s R&R as its opinion. King’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 10th day of July, 2024. bern Varver SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown