UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

J.M. CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 23-6514

LOUISIANA HIGH SCHOOL SECTION “R” (3) ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC.

ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff’s unopposed motion for leave to file an amended complaint.1 The Court has reviewed the complaint,2 plaintiff’s motion, the record, the applicable law, and Magistrate Judge Eva Dossier’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”).3 On April 17, 2025, Magistrate Judge Dossier issued an R&R, recommending that the Court grant plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint.4 Defendant did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds,

(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection

1 R. Doc. 30. 2 R. Doc. 1. 3 R. Doc. 31. 4 R. Doc. 31. is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the reeommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s R&R as its opinion. The Court GRANTS plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this _12th day of May, 2025.

here Virnen. SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE