Lebourgeois v. Louisiana State

United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana

Lebourgeois v. Louisiana State

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

ZACHARY LEBOURGEOIS CIVIL ACTION

VERSUS NO. 24-359

STATE OF LOUISIANA SECTION “R” (5)

ORDER AND REASONS

Plaintiff Zachary Lebourgeois was a state pretrial detainee housed at the Jefferson Parish Correctional Center when he filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus under

42 U.S.C. § 2241

on February 8, 2024.1 On April 1, 2025, Magistrate Judge Michael B. North issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court dismiss the motion as moot.2 Lebourgeois did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

79 F.3d 1415, 1430

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds,

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error.

1 R. Doc. 1. 2 R. Doc. 17. Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge North’s R&R as its opinion. Lebourgeois’s petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as moot.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this _17th day of June, 2025. ern Varven SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown