Sinegal v. Cates

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Sinegal v. Cates

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

ROBERT F. SINEGAL CASE NO. 6:25-CV-00433 SEC P VERSUS JUDGE ROBERT R. SUMMERHAYS IRVIN CATES, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST

JUDGMENT For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant suit be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915

(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions [see ECF Nos. 4, 5, 10, 11, 15, 16 and 23] be DENIED as MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court provide a copy of this Judgment to the manager of the Three Strikes List in Tyler, Texas. Sinegal is hereby placed on NOTICE that this Judgment constitutes a strike under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g). As Sinegal now has four strikes,' he is BARRED from proceeding in forma

' See Case No. 6:24-cv-1792, ECF No. 30; Case No. 6:25-cv-369, ECF No. 46; Case No. 6:25-cv-572, ECF No. 19.

pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.”

SIGNED in chambers this | day of June, 2025.

ROBERT R. SUMM YS UNITED STATES DISTRIC GE

2 See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g); McGarrah v. Alford,

783 F.3d 584, 585

(Sth Cir. 2015). Page 2 of 2

Reference

Status
Unknown