Antonio Lashun Nolan v. Officer Buchanan, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION ANTONIO LASHUN NOLAN CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-1144-P VERSUS JUDGE DONALD E. WALTER OFFICER BUCHANAN, ET AL. MAGISTRATE JUDGE MCCLUSKY MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court are a “Motion For Relief From Final Judgment” and a “Motion To Stay Effect Of Judgment And Clarify Record” filed pro se by the plaintiff, Antonio Lashun Nolan (“Nolan”). See Record Documents 34 and 35. Nolan complains of things that have been previously asserted and ruled upon by this Court. Furthermore, Nolan has appealed this Court’s adoption of the Report and Recommendation, dismissing his claims. See Record Document 31.

It is well-settled that a notice of appeal filed after entry of a final judgment on the merits divests the district court of jurisdiction over the events involved in the appeal. See Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58, 103 S. Ct. 400 (1982). Accordingly, and after due consideration, IT IS ORDERED that Nolan’s motions (Record Documents 34 and 35) are DENIED.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, this 7th day of January, 2026.

d Doraal bu. abel / UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE