Yu Hin Chan v. Karen May Bacdayan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA YU HIN CHAN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 25-1959 KAREN MAY BACDAYAN SECTION “R” (3)

ORDER AND REASONS Plaintiff Yu Hin Chan, filed this pro se and in forma pauperis action on September 19, 2025.1 On February 11, 2026, Magistrate Judge Eva J.

Dossier issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice.2 Plaintiff did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error.

1 R. Doc. 1.

2 R. Doc. 6.

Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Dossier’s R&R as its opinion. Chan’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

New Orleans, Louisiana, this _10th_ day of March, 2026.

Lerwk Varvee SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE