Mitchel v. Jewel

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mitchel v. Jewel, 7 Mart. 185 (La. 1820)

Mitchel v. Jewel

Opinion of the Court

The counsel observed, that as both the clerk and the district judge had certified that the record con*186tained the whole testimony, the presumption must be that Filhiol, though sworn, was not examined.

On this, Turner, for the plaintiff and appellant,moved for and obtained a writ of certiorari.

Thereupon, the counsel introduced the affidavit of the defendant, showing that Filhiol was examined.

Reference

Full Case Name
MITCHEL v. JEWEL
Status
Published