Dreux v. His Creditors
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the * court. Jacques Dreux and E. Legoaster, cre ditors of the insolvent, opposed the homolo-gation of the tableau of distribution, prepared 0 by the- syndics. It was homologated, and J J 0 ¡ they appealed. ' rr .
Dreux opposed the homologation on (he ground, that the insolvent’s wife was placed before him as a mortgage creditor, while she
Legoaster’s opposition was on the ground, that he ought to have been ranked as a mortgage creditor in consequence of a judgment obtained against the insolvent before his failure, which was timely recorded.
We are of opinion, that Jacques Dreux ought to have been placed on the tableau, before Madame Dreux, with regard to the negroes mortgaged to them with his consent, and as to whom she renounced her privilege/ For this purpose, the respective value of the property specially mortgaged, ought to be ascertained, and the tableau new modelled accordingly.
We are of opinion, that Jacques Dreux, not having been legally appointed syndic, is entitled to no commission.
Legoaster has been denied his rank as a
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be annulled, avoided and reversed, the tableau set aside, and the case remanded, with directions to the district court to make a new one. in which the appellant, Jacques Dreux. shall be placed, as far as regards the mortgage of the slaves on which Mrs. Dreux has renounced to her rights before her and the appellant, Legoaster, as a mortgage creditor, according to the date of the registry of his judgment ; and it is ordered, that the ap-pellees pay costs in this court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.