Shepherd v. Carlin
Shepherd v. Carlin
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court This is a petitory action. The plain
The defendants purchased from Valiere in 1793 or 4, and have been in possession ever since. In their answer, they plead prescription, and the evidence sustains the plea. They had a just title, and possessed animo domini. The plaintiffs, it is true, are proved to have been non-residents; and twenty years are required to bar them. But these twenty years had expired in the year 1814 or 1815: and there is no evidence before us, of minority, or any other cause existing, during this time, which could prevent the prescription from attaching, or which would have suspended it.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SHEPHERD & AL v. CARLIN & AL.
- Status
- Published