Painpaie v. Martin
Painpaie v. Martin
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff having purchased from the defendant a slave, for the price of twelve hundred dollars, one-half of which he paid in cash, and gave his note for the balance, payable seven months after date, brought the present action for the rescission of the sale, on account of redhibitory defects and maladies. There was a verdict in his favor for six hundred dollars, or the return of his note. Judgment was rendered for the sum of six hundred dollars, to be satisfied by the return of the note. The defendant’s warrantor moved for a new trial, which was overruled.
The plaintiff appealed, after an unsuccessful attempt to have the judgment amended according to the verdict.
The plaintiff’s counsel has contended, that it is evident that the verdict of the jury was inaccurately recorded. The disjunctive or, being used, instead of the copulative and. This being the case, it was the duty of the plaintiff’s counsel to have assented to a new trial, which would have afforded the best opportunity of correcting the error, instead of asking what was already done, that there should be a judgment according to the verdict.
Our attention has not been drawn to any other part of the record, and the verdict has not been complained of in this court by the defendant.
On a close examination of this case, it has appeared to us, that it is our duty to relieve the appellant. It is evident that he is entitled to recover the whole price of the slave, one-half of which only has been awarded him.
It is, therefore, ordered, a'djudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be annulled, avoided and
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PAINPAIE v. MARTIN
- Status
- Published