The judgment of the court was pronounced by

This suit is brought upon a note, drawn by the defendant to the order of the plaintiff. It has endorsed upon it a credit, as of January 5th, 1839, of $1,308 72.

The defence rests upon the alleged usuriousness of the contract, and a claim also that there should be a credit for a much larger amount, to wit: the entire proceeds of certain cotton placed by the defendant under the control of plaintiffs, a portion of which the plaintiffs contend was properly appropriated to another note.

The jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs for <¡¡¡1,460 04, with interest from the date of the alleged credit. There is strong reason to suppose that they arrived at this result, by applying the proceeds of the cotton entirely to this note. The evidence on the point of imputation is not satisfactory to our minds; and we think justice requires that this cause should be remanded, that this matter of imputation may be unequivocally ascertained.

The loan being made in depreciated bank notes was usurious*. The amount of depreciation of the notes so given below the standard of lawful coin should *458lie deducted from the face of the note, also the interest embodied in the note. Under the^statute'of Mississippi, where this contract was made, no interest whatever is recoverable upon a contract tainted with usury; and, iu allowing interest, the jury erred.

It is tíierefóré'deereed1 that the judgment of the court below be reversed, and that this cause be remanded for a new trial, and for further proceedings according to law; the defendant paying the costs of this appeal.