Succession of Logan

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Succession of Logan, 4 La. Ann. 279 (La. 1849)
Slidell

Succession of Logan

Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court (King, J. absent,) was pronounced by

Slidell, J.

In this case the transcript not having been seasonably filed, and no application for time having been made, the motion to dimiss must prevail. It appears by the affidavit of the appellant’s counsel, that the omission was attributable to a mistake on his part. But this is not a ground for relief. See Ducournau v. Levistones, 2 An. 245; ante p. 30.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Status
Published