Succession of Logan
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Succession of Logan, 4 La. Ann. 279 (La. 1849)
Slidell
Succession of Logan
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court (King, J. absent,) was pronounced by
In this case the transcript not having been seasonably filed, and no application for time having been made, the motion to dimiss must prevail. It appears by the affidavit of the appellant’s counsel, that the omission was attributable to a mistake on his part. But this is not a ground for relief. See Ducournau v. Levistones, 2 An. 245; ante p. 30.
Appeal dismissed.
Reference
- Status
- Published