Mitchell v. Lay
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Succession of Uthoff (La. 1941)
- Elliott v. Heard (La. 1950)
- Bannister v. Chisesi Longo (La. Ct. App. 1941)
- Esparros v. Vicknair (La. 1938)
- Jackson v. Jackson (La. Ct. App. 1935)
- Sammons v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co. (La. 1916)
- In re Lindner (La. 1904)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
The order of appeal was granted upon motion, and in general terms. It must be considered as embracing not only the plaintiff in the cause, but also the sureties in the injunction bond, who, by a fiction of law (Statute of 1831,) are parties plaintiffs in the injunction. The appeal being ordered upon motion, the sureties are to be considered as having been cited as appellees. Act
It is, therefore, ordered that, the decree against the sureties, Ryan and Newhurger, remain undisturbed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.