Kohlman v. Ludwig
Kohlman v. Ludwig
5 La. 33
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court (Rost, J. absent) was pronounced by
The evidence shows that the plaintiff became the holder of the promissory note for value, before maturity, in good faith, and without notice of the pretended equities between the maker and prior endorser. Whether the alleged equities existed or not is, therefore, immaterial.
It is therefore decreed that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, with costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.