Succession of Petit
Succession of Petit
Opinion of the Court
This is a contest between two applicants for the administrator-ship of the succession of JustinPetit, deceased. On the 28th of September, 1853,
We think the District Court erred. It is shown that Lafon was a creditor under the alleged transfer from Poussau, the verity of which does not appear to have been impugned. In contestations concerning the administration of successions, our Code, Arts.A039, 1114, gives the preference to creditors over those who are not. A special agent, or attorney in fact, of one or more creditors, is not entitled to a preference over strangers. Even on the hypothesis that La-fon's claim as a creditor was unfounded, still, as the first applicant, he was clearly entitled to the appointment; the opposition of the other could only be sustained on the ground of his having a better right.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be avoided and reversed, and that this case be remanded for further proceedings according to law, with instructions to the Judge aguo to proceed to the appointment of Sagmond Lafon as administrator of the succession of Justin Petit, deceased, as the law directs; and it is further decreed that the appellee, Gabriel Gusman, pay the costs of his opposition in both courts.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.