Hynes v. Morin
Hynes v. Morin
Opinion of the Court
The appellant states his case thus:
“ (7. A. Morin, ivas the holder and owner of two promissory notes subscribed by Thomas Hynes, one for the sum of $1,680, the other for the sum of $1,770, and secured both by the same mortgage upon the sa/me property,
“At the maturity of tile first note, to wit: that of $1,080, Morin brought suit upon it, obtained judgment against Hynes and issued a, fi.fa. under which the Sheriff seized the mortgaged property and sold it for $2,400 cash.
“The Sheriff then deducted his costs, amounting to $45 £0, and applied the balance, to wit: $2,354 50, to the payment: 1st. of the outstanding note of $1,770, and 2d, of the writ in his hands which amounted, -with interest and costs, to $1,780 05; thus leaving a balance of $1,204 56, still due under the writ.
“Por the recovery of this balance, Morin issued an alias fi.fa., whicli was enjoined by Hynes, upon the ground that the sheriff ought to have applied the proceeds of the sale to the payment in full of the writ, and that the latter was, therefore, satisfied.”
“The District Judge was of a like opinion and made the injunction perpetual.”
“Prom this judgment Morin has appealed.”
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas Hynes v. C. A. Morin
- Status
- Published