Harris v. Peel
Harris v. Peel
17 La. Ann. 140
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Hicks v. Bell (La. Ct. App. 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, as the holder of a mortgage note, sued out a writ of seizure and sale as to the mortgaged property.
His proceedings are regular; and, upon the examination of the record, we find no error prejudicial to the appellant.
This appeal was taken for delay; but, as the note, the basis of the seizure, bears eight per cent, interest, we simply affirm the judgment, with costs.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.