Nash v. East
Nash v. East
Opinion of the Court
This is an action on a promissory note by an endorser, after maturity, against the maker, the defense to which is a failure of consideration, and a subsequent agreement between the maker and payee, that the note should be extinguished by an account held by the maker against the mother of the payee.
The only question is presented by a bill of exceptions taken to the ruling of the District Judge, excluding, on the score of Ínteres);, the testimony of the payee offered by the defendant and appellant.
In either view he is a competent witness for the maker.
Justice requires the case to be remanded to afford the parties an opportunity to have their rights adjusted, as the record does not enable us to do so.
It is therefore ordered that tlie judgment appealed from be reversed, and tlio case remanded, to be proceeded in according to law, with instructions to tlio District Judge to admit the testimony of L. W. Brown, the endorser.
Plaintiff to pay costs of appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.