Webster v. Mahoney
Webster v. Mahoney
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs, domiciliated in the city of New Orleans, sold to Mahoney & Davidson, in 1863, groceries, etc., to the amount of $869 31; and alleging that Mahoney & Davidson were commercial partners, they sued Mahoney, now a resident of New Orleans, for the debt. /
The evidence proves that Mahoney & Davidson were “blockade runners,” residing at Biloxi; that the plaintiffs knew the facts, and that they assisted in carrying the illicit traffic into effect.
Under these circumstances, they can not recover, because the contract was contrary to the prohibitory law of Congress. Acts 1861, thirteenth July, section five; 2 Black. 635; 19 An. 328;. 20 An. 241.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the district court bo affirmed, with costs of appeal.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Webster & McKenna v. John Mahoney
- Status
- Published