Succession of Richardson
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Government Employees Insurance v. Thompson (La. Ct. App. 1977)
- Braun v. Veillon (La. 1928)
- Braun v. Veillon (La. 1928)
- United Railway Men's Oil Ass'n v. Dupuy (La. 1927)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The motion to dismiss this appeal because the opponents, who are the appellants, have not given bond, must prevail. The only bond we find in the record is subscribed by M. McQueen, as principal, and Charles B. Austin, as security.
It is not necessary that the appellant should sign the appeal bond; but an appeal granted to Elizabeth McQueen and others can not be perfected by an appeal bond signed by M. McQueen, as principal, and Charles B. Austin, as security. The surety of M. McQueen can not be regarded as the surety of Elizabeth McQueen.
It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at the costs of the appellants.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.