City of New Orleans v. Klein
City of New Orleans v. Klein
Opinion of the Court
This suit is for the taxes of 1871, payable in 1872. The defense is that the taxes exceed the authority conferred; that the defendant can not be made to pay taxes for a debt created by the city before her property was brought within the limits of the city; that the assessors and city administrators were not legally appointed; that the park tax, the school tax and the police tax, embraced in the bill, are for purposes of State institutions, and unconstitutional because the tax is not uniform throughout the State, and that two of the ordinances, fixing two items in the bill, were adopted after the month of December, in which month alone the Council had power to assess any tax for the ensuing year.
The first two grounds of defense are disposed of in the case of City v. Estate of Burthe, just decided, except as to three-quarters of one per cent., which were authorized by special statutes on the subject.
The third ground as to the official tenure of the said officers can not be urged in this proceeding. There is a law providing for the settlement of such questions.
The next ground, as to the nature of the public park, the public
The last ground, as to the date of the ordinances being subsequent to the month of December, was disposed of in the case of the City v. Crescent Mutual Insurance Company, 25 An. 390.
There is error, however, in allowing interest for one year before the taxes were due.
It is therefore ordered that the iudgment appealed from be amended by allowing interest thereon from thirty-first July, 1872, instead of thirty-first July, 1871, and that as thus amended it be affirmed; costs of appeal to be paid by appellee.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.