Stafford v. Pearson
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dantoni v. Distefano (La. Ct. App. 1932)
- Broussard-Labry Inc. v. People's Bank & Trust Co. (La. Ct. App. 1927)
- Henry Lochte Co. v. Lefevre (La. 1911)
- Milliken v. Barrow (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana 1895)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendants appeal from the judgment against them
They assign as error oí law that of the account sued on, items amounting in the aggregate, to $378 98. were not necessary supplies; and therefore, the privilege to that extent should be reduced. The items objected to, consisting mainly of tobacco, pipes, whisky, cards, perfumery, etc., etc., are in no sense supplies necessary to make acrop. 23 An. 469. For such supplies the law allows no privilege.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment be amended by reducing the amount of the privilege three hundred and seventy eight dollars and ninety-eight, cents, and .as thus amended let'it be affirmed, appellee paying costs of appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.