Succession of Bauman
Succession of Bauman
Opinion of the Court
On Opposition of Heirs.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
John Fisher was appointed and qualified as executor of Maria Bauman’s will. He was also one of her heirs. The property consists of improved lots in the town of New Iberia, which were inventoried at f7,350. He has filed three accounts, to which two of the heirs presented as many separate oppositions. The grounds of opposition are numerous, and evidently designed to put him to the proof of his whole gestión. Some of them were that the rents, due and
It is quite impossible, and would be improper, to go through these •accounts in this opinion item by item, and state the charge, the proof, and its effect. The vouchers and the oral testimony of the executor are very complete, and in our judgment substantiate the account in its entirety. Besides which, we meet in this case what we had placed before us in another case at this term — two whole transcripts of other cases offered, we are informed, to prove rem ipsam. The fact could ■so easily have been stated under the form of a joint admission that we are not inclined hereafter to permit this mode of burthening the court with unnecessary labour.
It is very easy for persons, who have had nothing to do with the practical management of an estate, to conceive sundry ways in which its revenues might and ought to have been increased, and its expenses diminished. This house did not rent for what might have been obtained for it, or that house was shut up when a tenant might have been had. The ■sum charged here for repairs is excessive, and that charged there was' uselessly expended. But all who are familiar with the management of successions in the last few years, either as executor or lawyer, know the many and serious embarrassments, and hindrances, that have, existed to the successful gestión of an estate. The executor of Mrs. Bauman has shewn more than ordinary care, judgment, and diligence, in the collection of the small rents for each lot, and as a whole, his administration, thus far is not fairly liable to attack.
There is some question as to the proof of some of the items — its ■sufficiency, completeness, etc. An executor must sustain his charges by proof, but the kind and degree of proof varies according to other facts which may be proved, or which appear on the face of the papers. For instance, an executor whose general management is characterized by fidelity and integrity, will have a presumption raised in his favor of the correctness of his account, and many items charged by such a representative of a succession will be admitted and approved upon slenderer proof than would be required of one who had by his conduct exhibited •the purpose to administer for his personal benefit, instead of for that of those who are entitled to the succession, and who had united negligence to rapacity in dealing with the property and funds of the succession.
The appellee prays the amendment of the judgment, so as to decree
The judgment of the lower court is correct, and it is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Succession of Maria Bauman. On Opposition of Heirs
- Status
- Published