Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1896

Metropolitan Bank v. Commercial Soap, Candle & Starch Manufactory

Metropolitan Bank v. Commercial Soap, Candle & Starch Manufactory
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided June 22, 1896 · McEnery
48 La. Ann. 1383; 20 So. 889; 1896 La. LEXIS 644
Metropolitan Bank v. Commercial Soap, Candle & Starch Manufactory

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McEnery, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment appointing a re*1384ceiver. A suspensive appeal was taken. The motion to dismiss is on the ground that the judgment appealed from was one which should be provisionally executed, notwithstanding the appeal, and therefore no suspensive appeal would lie therefrom.

Some judgments, notwithstanding the suspensive appeal, are provisionally executed. These are named in Art. 580, paragraphs 1 and 2, C. P., and Art. 1059, C. P.

The appeal for the appointment of a receiver to a corporation is not enumerated, and is therefore excluded.

The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.