Key v. McCall
Key v. McCall
Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss.
The judgment appealed from decrees a partition, and orders a sale to be made to effect the partition, and orders
Ordinarily a motion to dismiss comes too late if filed more than three days after the filing of the transcript, or if filed after the appellee himself has caused the appeal to be fixed for trial. Saxon v. Southwestern Brick Company, 113 La. 637, 37 South. 540. But, necessarily, this can be the case only where the grounds of dismissal existed within the three days or at the time of the assignment for trial. In the present instance they did not. The acquiescence upon which the motion to dismiss is based did not take place until October 12, 1908, long after the expiration of the three days and after the assignment for trial.
Appeal dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- KEY v. McCALL
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal and Erroe (§ 797*) — Dismissal oe Appeal — Motion—Time. The rule that a motion to dismiss an appeal comes too late if filed more than three days after the filing of the transcript, or if filed after appellee has caused the appeal to be set for trial, does not apply where appellant’s acquiescence in the decree on which the motion to dismiss the appeal is based does not take place until long after the expiration of the three days, and after the assignment of the cause for trial. (Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 3149-3154; Dec. Dig. § 797.*]