The defendant is charged with having stolen a cow.

The law and the facts are similar to those in No. 18,561, decision handed down this day (ante, p. 951, 54 South. 297).

The only difference is that the cow charged to have been stolen is a different cow from the one charged to have been stolen in No. 18,561.

The- law and the evidence being in favor of defendant, the judgment and sentence are avoided, annulled, and reversed, and the defendant is discharged without day.