Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916

State v. Feducia

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided February 21, 1916 · Provosty

138 La. 974; 70 So. 1010; 1916 La. LEXIS 1555

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Heintz (La. 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PROVOSTY, J.

The accused, convicted of having sold intoxicating liquors without a *975license, lias appealed from a refusal to grant him a new trial which he asked for in order to have an opportunity to impeach the two state witnesses upon whose testimony he was convicted, by producing two witnesses, newly discovered, who would testify that the two state witnesses were of bad repute, because engaged in the sale of whisky without a license, which fact the newly discovered witnesses knew because they themselves had bought whisky from them.

Impeaching testimony is no ground for a new trial. State v. Young, 107 La. 619, 31 South. 993.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.