State v. Tuminello
Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. Tuminello, 138 La. 1078 (La. 1916)
71 So. 190; 1916 La. LEXIS 1740
Monroe
State v. Tuminello
Opinion of the Court
Defendant, having been convicted of retailing intoxicating liquors
The transcript contains no bill of exception, there has been no assignment of error, and we find no error patent upon the face of the record. The conviction and sentence appealed from are therefore
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE v. TUMINELLO
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- (Syllabus by the Court.) Cbiminai, Law Where the transcript in a criminal case contains no bill of exception, and there has been no assignment of error, and no error is patent upon the face of the record, the conviction and sentence will be affirmed. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 3203-3214; Dec. Dig. 1182.]