State v. Tuminello

Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. Tuminello, 138 La. 1078 (La. 1916)
71 So. 190; 1916 La. LEXIS 1740
Monroe

State v. Tuminello

Opinion of the Court

MONROE, C. J.

Defendant, having been convicted of retailing intoxicating liquors *1079without having previously obtained a license therefor from the police jury of the parish of Caddo, or the authorities of the city of Shreveport, and, having been sentenced to pay a fine exceeding $300 and suffer certain imprisonment in the parish jail, prosecutes this appeal.

The transcript contains no bill of exception, there has been no assignment of error, and we find no error patent upon the face of the record. The conviction and sentence appealed from are therefore

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE v. TUMINELLO
Status
Published
Syllabus
(Syllabus by the Court.) Cbiminai, Law Where the transcript in a criminal case contains no bill of exception, and there has been no assignment of error, and no error is patent upon the face of the record, the conviction and sentence will be affirmed. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 3203-3214; Dec. Dig. 1182.]