Durnin v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.
Durnin v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff alleges that he was standing on the corner of Felicity and Magazine streets waiting to take a ear, on March 9, 1914, about 7 o’clock in the evening. He says that he hailed the approaching ear, and as it neared him it increased its speed, and the rear end of the car swung around and hit him on the leg, breaking it below the knee.
Defendant admits that plaintiff was injured at the time and to the extent indicated, but denies all responsibility therefor, and alleges that defendant attempted to board a moving car, which was going rapidly, and that he was guilty of gross carelessness.
There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff has appealed.
The evidence shows that plaintiff was
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- DURNIN v. NEW ORLEANS RY. & LIGHT CO.
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- (Syllabus by the Court.) Street Railroads Where plaintiff is at fault, he cannot recover damages from the defendant, who is not at fault, for an accident which has befallen him.