Maher v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
Maher v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff alleges that while he was walking across the tracks of the defendant company's railroad in the city of Baton Rouge he was knocked down without any fault of his own by a train of the defendant, as the result of no lookout having been kept by the crew of the train and of absence of all warning, either by sound ox-light, of the approach of the train.
An exception of no cause of action was sustained, and the suit dismissed.
The judgment appealed from is set aside, and the case is remanded to be proceeded with according to law.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- MAHER v. LOUISIANA RY. & NAV. CO.
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- (Syllabus by Editorial Staf.) 1. Railroads One run clown by a railroad train on a street crossing is not necessarily at fault, but only so if he contributed to the event by his negligence. 2. Railroads In an action against a railroad for injuries at a crossing, the burden of pleading contributory negligence is on the railroad. 3. Railroads In an action for injuries at a railroad crossing, the petition should show absence of design on the part of the injured person to bring about the accident, which is done by the allegation that he was in no wise at fault.