State v. Readman

Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. Readman, 144 La. 311 (La. 1919)
80 So. 548; 1919 La. LEXIS 1559
Dawkins, Provosty, Takes

State v. Readman

Opinion of the Court

PROVOSTY, J.

The accused, a police offi-

cer, was convicted of having received a bribe for conniving at the sale of intoxicating liquors without a license, and was sentenced to a term in the penitentiary of not less than one year and not more than two years, and has appealed.

We find no bill of exception, or other assignment of error, in the record, and, as the proceedings appear to have been regular,

Judgment affirmed.

' DAWKINS, J., takes no part.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE v. READMAN
Status
Published
Syllabus
(Syllables by Editorial Staff.) Criminal Law &wkey;5ll82 — Appeal — Affirmance. Where there is no bill of exceptions, or other assignment of error in the record, and the proceedings appear to have been regular, conviction will be affirmed.