Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1920

Whitney Central Trust & Savings Bank v. Greenwood Planting & Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided February 2, 1920 · Monroe

146 La. 572; 83 So. 834; 1920 La. LEXIS 1767

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Calvert Fire Insurance v. Jones (La. Ct. App. 1957)
Mississippi River Bridge Authority v. Norman (La. 1956)
Port Barre Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Construction Co. (La. 1956)
Crosby v. Lone Star Cement Corp. (La. Ct. App. 1956)
Merchants & Manufacturers Bank v. Southern Engineering & Construction Co. (La. 1955)
Southern Premium Service v. Oddo (La. 1954)
W. T. Burton Co. v. Stevens & Co. (La. 1950)
Gazzo v. Bisso Ferry Co. (La. Ct. App. 1937)
Mitcham v. Mitcham (La. 1935)
Vinyard v. Stassi (La. Ct. App. 1934)
Weber v. Kemp (La. Ct. App. 1933)
Klumpp v. Fontenot (La. Ct. App. 1929)
Jacobs v. Weaver Rivers (La. 1928)
Braud v. Huth (La. 1923)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, C. J.

On April 6, 1916, defendant obtained an order herein for a devolutive appeal, returnable in this court on May 9, 1916, from an order of seizure and sale of *573date April 14, 1915, and it lodged tlie transcript in tills court on June 1, 1916, or, say, on the twenty-third day after the return day, upon which ground, and another, the defendant now moves to dismiss the appeal. No application for an extension of time for filing the transcript having been presented to, or acted on by, this court, and the law fixing three days as the limit of time beyond the' return day within which a transcript can be filed, without such extension, the motion must prevail. C. P. arts. 589, 594; Untereiner v. Miller, 29 La. Ann. 435; Laussade v. Maury, 31 La. Ann. 858; Coudroy v. Pecot, 51 La. Ann. 495, 25 South. 270; Le Blanc v. Lemaire, 52 La. Ann. 1637, 28 South. 105; Boudreaux v. Boudreaux, 122 La. 433, 47 South. 758.

The appeal is therefore dismissed, at the cost of the appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.