By Division A, composed of Chief Justice PROVOSTY and Justices OVERTON and LECHE.

This suit is based on a state of facts exactly similar to that in the case of Duke v. Crawford, Jenkins & Booth (No. 24784; La.) 91 South. 440,1 this day decided, and involves the same legal propositions. Eor the reasons there stated, judgment affirmed.

Rehearing refused by Division B, composed of Justices O’NIELL, LAND, and BAKER.