Friedman v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Friedman v. Sullivan, 138 So. 431 (La. 1931)
173 La. 647; 1931 La. LEXIS 1922
Paul

Friedman v. Sullivan

Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss.

ST. PAUL, J.

The administrator herein sequestered certain cattle of the value of $500, claiming that they belonged to the succession and had been unlawfully taken possession of by one Mrs. Belle Friedman and her husband.

The defendants in the sequestration proceedings moved to dissolve the'writ, but the trial judges ruled against them.

Thereupon the plaintiffs in rule sought and obtained an appeal to this court, which appeal the administrator moves to dismiss.

As the amount involved is only $500, and there is no question of a fund to be distributed, it is clear that this court has no jurisdiction, and the appeal will therefore be transferred to the proper Court of Appeal.

Decree.

For the reasons assigned, it is therefore ordered that this appeal be now transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for the parish of East Baton Rouge, provided that the record, or a duly certified transcript thereof, be filed in said Court of Appeal within twenty days after this decree becomes final; otherwise the appeal to stand dismissed.

It is further ordered that the appellant pay the costs of this court, and that all other costs await the final disposition of' the case.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of the Succession of Mrs. Susan SULLIVAN, Dec’d. Mrs. Belle FRIEDMAN, Et Al. Opponent, and Plaintiffs in Rule, v. W. P. SULLIVAN, Administrator, Defendant in Rule
Status
Published