Smith v. Atkins
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Timon v. Timon (La. 1953)
- State v. Scott (La. 1950)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, -appellee, moves to di-s-miss the -appeal in thi-s e-ase -on the -ground -that the transcript is incomplete.
An appeal will -not be -dismissed without first -allowing the appellant time to complete -the transcript -in -compliance with the provisions of Act 234 of 1932.
Upon submission of the motion to dismiss the appeal, the appellant has filed a supplemental transcript -containing the documents -that the -appellee claims were left out of the transcript. On three prior occasions we have entertained -controversies between the parties -to this suit involving the property in -dispute herein. See Atkins v. Smith, 204 La. 468, 15 So. 2d 855; Atkins v. Smith, 207 La. 560, 21 So.2d 728 -and Smith v. Atkin-s, 211 La. 369, 30 So.2d 121. It was not necessary to incorporate in the transcript a -copy of our opinions in those cases or portions of ou-r records -in the prior suits because we can take cognizance of our -own -records.
For the reasons assigned, the motion is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.