Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Co.
Cases that cite this one
28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- Intern. Harvester Credit Corp. v. Majors (La. Ct. App. 1985)
- West v. Gajdzik (La. Ct. App. 1982)
- Ross v. Brown Title Corporation (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1973)
- Camille Landry v. Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 2020)
- Alexander v. State (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- Tracy Alexander v. State of La; Dept. of Children & Family Services (La. Ct. App. 2018)
- Walter Mortgage Co. v. Turner (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light (La. 2007)
- Succession of Crumbley (La. Ct. App. 2006)
- Succession of Ja Kun Kang Crumbley (La. Ct. App. 2006)
- Collins v. Estrade (La. Ct. App. 1994)
- Sweeney, Inc. v. Olivier (La. Ct. App. 1991)
- Allain v. First Guaranty Bank (La. Ct. App. 1991)
- Moore v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. (La. Ct. App. 1988)
- Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Williams (La. Ct. App. 1983)
- Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield (La. 1983)
- Bush v. Lee (La. Ct. App. 1983)
- Ellerd v. Williams (La. Ct. App. 1978)
- Cameron Brown South, Inc. v. East Glen Oaks, Inc. (La. Ct. App. 1976)
- Schoen v. Burns (La. Ct. App. 1975)
- Johnson v. Jones-Journet (La. Ct. App. 1974)
- Slidell Building Sup., Inc. v. IDS Mortgage Corp. (La. Ct. App. 1973)
- Associates Discount Corporation v. Bankston (La. Ct. App. 1971)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Dissenting Opinion
thinks that a writ should be granted, being in accord with the views of FOURNET, C. J.
Opinion of the Court
In re: Guaranty Finance Company, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 158 So.2d 228.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the Cottrt of Appeal the result is correct.
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion the judgment complained of is wrong and the writ should be granted. The judgment sought to have annulled was granted by a court of competent jurisdiction after service of citation on the defendant, a default duly entered and after proper delays, hence the judgment can only be annulled for causes set forth in the Code of Civil Procedure and subject to the one year prescription therein provided.
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion that a writ should be granted on the ground that the one year prescription of Article 2004, LSA-Code of Civil Procedure, is applicable to the action to annul the deficiency judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.