State v. Investigation by Garrison

Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. Investigation by Garrison, 162 So. 2d 17 (La. 1964)
245 La. 974; 1964 La. LEXIS 3039
Fournet, Hamiter, Refusal, Summers, Writs

State v. Investigation by Garrison

Opinion of the Court

In re Elmer R. Tapper applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. The trial judge’s ruling on the objections set forth in relator’s motion to quash issuance of subpoenas is correct. The other contentions and allegations made in relator’s application for writs to this court are not contained in the motion and have not been submitted to the trial judge, and he has not made any ruling thereon. In view of this fact they are not properly before this court.

Dissenting Opinion

FOURNET, C. j;, and SUMMERS, J.,

are of the opinion the writs should be granted. R.S. 15:156 does not authorize a so called “open hearing”, consequently any proceeding thereunder is illegal. The statute only authorizes the taking of the deposition of the witnesses before a judge or justice of the peace as done before grand jurors.

HAMITER, J., concurs in the refusal of the writs.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Louisiana v. INVESTIGATION BY Jim GARRISON, District Attorney, Orleans Parish
Status
Published