Lane v. Travelers Insurance Co.
Lane v. Travelers Insurance Co.
162 So. 2d 9; 245 La. 951; 1964 La. LEXIS 3010
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Lane v. Travelers Insurance Co.
Dissenting Opinion
is of the opinion that the writ should be granted for error of law in rejecting proof by probabilities under the preponderance of evidence rule. See Perkins v. Texas & N. O. Railroad, 243 La. 829, 147 So.2d 646; and Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Co., 244 La. 569, 153 So.2d 395.
Opinion of the Court
In re: Selma Boykin Lane applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Lincoln. 159 So.2d 313.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.