Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1964

Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided October 7, 1964 · App, Casualty, Draft, Fire, Granted, Ins, Law, Prosser, Restatement, Richard, Sanders, Should, That, Torts
246 La. 842; 167 So. 2d 668; 1964 La. LEXIS 2727

Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Opinion of the Court

In re: Marguerite and Jasper Miller applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 164 So.2d 676.

*843Writ refused. The result is correct.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should he granted. See Corkern v. Travelers Ins. Co., 229 La. 592, 86 So.2d 205; Richard v. General Fire & Casualty Co., La.App., 155 So.2d 676; Restatement of Torts (2nd) Section 343 A (Tentative Draft); and Prosser, Law of Torts (3rd ed.) p. 404.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑