Pelloat v. Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- City of Houma v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. (La. Ct. App. 1970)
- Carter v. City of New Orleans (La. Ct. App. 1976)
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Frugé (La. Ct. App. 1967)
- Marcile v. Dauzat (La. 2012)
- Blanchard v. City Parish of East Baton Rouge (La. Ct. App. 1996)
- Adams v. City of Baton Rouge (La. Ct. App. 1996)
- Heindel v. Harley-Davidson Motorcycles (La. Ct. App. 1985)
- West v. STATE, THROUGH SUP. OF PUB. ED. ETC. (La. Ct. App. 1977)
- Society To Oppose Pornography, Inc. v. Thevis (La. Ct. App. 1973)
- Leger ex rel. Leger v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance (La. Ct. App. 1972)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In re: Jacque Pelloat, Jr., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 175 So.2d 656.
Writ not considered. Since the Court of Appeal, after granting a writ of certiorari, disposed of the questions presented following a hearing on a rule nisi, its judgment thereon was a final adjudication. In view of this, applicants’ exclusive remedy for review by this Court was by certiorari under Section 11 of Art. VII of the Constitution. (See also Art. 2167 C.C.P.) However, we cannot consider an application under the Constitutional provision unless the aggrieved party has heretofore applied for a rehearing in the Court of Appeal and such application has been denied by that Court. These procedural prerequisites have not
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.