Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1968

Mayes v. McKeithen

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided November 15, 1968 · Actions, App, Appears, Brought, Burden, Cannot, Company, Determined, Evidence, Existence, Fact, Florane, Governing, Granted, Hence, Incorrect, Ins, Jones, Law, Misstatement, Produced, Proof, Reexamination, Review, Sanders, Satisfies, Should, Temple, Than, That, Town, Whether

252 La. 965; 215 So. 2d 130; 1968 La. LEXIS 2520

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Melancon v. McKeithen (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1972)
Pourteau v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (La. Ct. App. 1990)
Trapani v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (La. Ct. App. 1988)
Derouen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (La. Ct. App. 1984)
Jennings v. City of Alexandria (La. Ct. App. 1981)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In re: Gurthie A. Mayes and Charlie G. Garner applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 213 So. 2d 340.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error in the judgment.

SANDERS, Justice. I am of the opinion a writ should be granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal contains what appears to be a misstatement of the law governing the burden of proof in civil actions. Evidence showing that the existence of a disputed fact is more probable than not satisfies • the burden of proof. See Town of Slidell v. Temple, 246 La. 137, 164 So.2d 276; Dunphy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., 177 So.2d 610; Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. v. Florane, La.App., 173 So.2d 545; 1 Jones, The Law of Evidence, § 4, p. 6 (1938). Whether or not the misstatement of the burden of proof produced an incorrect result cannot be determined without a reexamination of the evidence. Hence, the record should be brought to this Court for review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.