Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

State v. Reames

Supreme Court of Louisiana
State v. Reames, 260 La. 1017 (La. 1972)
257 So. 2d 695; 1972 La. LEXIS 4810
Correct, Dixon, Incorrect, Ruling, Summers, That, Trial

State v. Reames

Opinion of the Court

In re: Bryan T. Reames applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for stay order.

Writ refused. The defendant has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction and sentence.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the ruling of the trial judge is correct.

State v. Angelo, 251 La. 250, 203 So.2d 710 (1967).

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is incorrect.

See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of Louisiana v. Bryan T. REAMES
Status
Published
↑