Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972

State ex rel. Billiot v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Decided March 8, 1972 · Barham, Charged, Dixon, Does, Granted, Guilty, Hamlin, Innocent, Law, Plead, Say, Should, State, That, Under, Words

260 La. 1131; 258 So. 2d 379; 1972 La. LEXIS 4902

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Langworthy v. Henderson (La. 1972)
State ex rel. Ryan v. Henderson (La. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

In re: Earl J. Billiot applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

HAMLIN, J., concurs and observes that applicant does not contend that he is innocent of the crime charged. BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

Counsel pleaded for the defendant in this felony case. Defendant must plead “in person.” See Code of Criminal Procedure Article 553 and redactor's comment thereunder and see former R.S. 15 :257.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the defendant himself must plead and say the words “guilty” or “not guilty” under the law of this State.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.